[Foundation-l] Fwd: Jimbo's response re:Rampant CheckuserPrivacy Abuse
Jimmy Wales
jwales at wikia.com
Wed Dec 12 20:55:21 UTC 2007
Brian McNeil wrote:
> I have CheckUser on the English Wikinews, and I am glad to say I have never
> been pressured to carry out a check in secret. My opinion is that no
> undocumented CheckUser should be performed.
I disagree. CheckUser should be used liberally with absolutely no
implication that the user being checked is suspected of wrongdoing.
Indeed, in many cases, the purpose of CheckUser is to *clear people*.
A checkuser who has confirmed that nothing is going wrong, need not
mention it. This is just routine work.
> Had this been done in secret then
> all the average user would have seen in RC was a months long block on an IP
> without knowing it had been verified to be a source of vandalism.
That's about giving an appropriate justification for a block, as opposed
to being about doing CheckUser quietly.
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list