[Foundation-l] Version history IS the section history

[Thomas Dalton]

On 05/12/2007, Klaus Graf <klausgraf at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > It seems the two of you are barking up the same tree. Nowhere does
> > Klaus say that the version history is invalid, quite on the contrary.
> > He is saying that it _is_ the version history, and therefore that one
> > is not allowed to copy Wikipedia material without republishing the
> > history page as well.
> >
> > --
> > Andre Engels, andreengels at gmail.com
>
> Hey. It's a rare event in this list that a responding list member has
> understood what was the meaning of a message ... Many thanks (and
> sorry for my bad English which might have supported the
> misunderstanding).

The meaning was pretty clear. The bit I still don't understand is who
you are claiming has said otherwise.