[Foundation-l] Alternatives to Cafepress

Casey Brown cbrown1023.ml at gmail.com
Tue Aug 28 11:25:53 UTC 2007


This sounds like a pretty cool idea. :-)

On 8/28/07, Sage Ross <ragesoss+wikipedia at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Perhaps we could arrange a Wikimedia "Loves Threadless" competition to
> generate some more T-shirt designs worth buying.  There seems to be an
> extremely active community of artists who participate in these design
> competitions, especially for organizations that have large fan-bases.
> For example, the recent "Gmail Loves Threadless" competition generated
> over 400 designs, many of them quite good:
>
>
> http://www.threadless.com/submissions/designs,gmail/showme,intherunning,completed,printed
>
> I'm not sure how the sponsors for these competitions are selected and
> whether/how much the sponsors are paying for the privilege, but it
> might be worth looking into.
>
> -Sage (User:Ragesoss)
>
>
> On 8/27/07, George Herbert <george.herbert at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 8/26/07, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 26/08/07, Brian <Brian.Mingus at colorado.edu> wrote:
> > > > I've been wearing my Wikipedia golf shirt, purchased I believe at
> Cafe
> > > > Press, for three years. It is as white as ever and has not suffered
> in
> > > > quality.
> > >
> > > The main problem with the CafePress process (and that used by most
> > > one-off printers) is that it's basically laser-printing to a shirt,
> > > i.e. toner particles melted into the fibres. This can work very well
> > > indeed, but is not going to be as good as silk-screen printing, which
> > > becomes cost-effective at a few tens of shirts or so.
> >
> > For most of the fabrics, it's actually inkjet to a transfer "paper",
> > which is then ironed on to the clothing item.  Attempting to
> > direct-print to fabric is problematic at this time.
> >
> > My wife has had stuff on CafePress for many years and has been active
> > talking with them about technology on and off.  She also does her own
> > stuff, for items where CafePress doesn't produce that type of item,
> > using a decent home inkjet printer and commercial iron-on transfer
> > material.
> >
> > > Of course, the other thing you're buying from CafePress is having
> > > someone do all the ordering, packing and posting backend - not just
> > > making sure you don't have a stock of maybe-saleable shirts.
> >
> > Right.  This is the big reason to use Cafe Press or its ilk; they
> > don't just produce the items, they have the "Store", and you don't
> > have to be in the "Store" business.  Just send them the design, and
> > collect whatever royalties the sales earn.
> >
> > There are plenty of screen print T-shirt companies, some of which can
> > do all sorts of other stuff, and plenty of other companies that can do
> > logos/artwork to mugs and so forth.  But very few of them will do the
> > online store thing.
> >
> >
> > --
> > -george william herbert
> > george.herbert at gmail.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>



-- 
Casey Brown
Cbrown1023

---
Note:  This e-mail address is used for mailing lists.  Personal emails sent
to
this address will probably get lost.


More information about the foundation-l mailing list