[Foundation-l] governance

Mark Williamson node.ue at gmail.com
Wed Apr 11 19:27:53 UTC 2007

We've had problems with mixing polls and languages in the past. I
suggest we not do it except as a straw poll.


On 11/04/07, Erik Moeller <erik at wikimedia.org> wrote:
> On 4/11/07, Milos Rancic <millosh at gmail.com> wrote:
> > For now, just a small practical input from my side...
> >
> > On 4/11/07, Florence Devouard <Anthere9 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > * should it be the board to decide closure of the Klingon Wiktionary ?
> >
> > This should be Language SubCom's job.
> No. The Language SubCom should not have the authority to close
> projects; that would give too much control to a single group with a
> very particular expertise (figuring out what constitutes an
> independent language). I see no reason why such a decision could not
> be made or at least informed through a public poll, similar to the way
> we decide on opening new projects.
> --
> Peace & Love,
> Erik
> DISCLAIMER: This message does not represent an official position of
> the Wikimedia Foundation or its Board of Trustees.
> "An old, rigid civilization is reluctantly dying. Something new, open,
> free and exciting is waking up." -- Ming the Mechanic
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Refije dirije lanmè yo paske nou posede pwòp bato.

More information about the foundation-l mailing list