[Foundation-l] governance

[Thomas Dalton]

> My comments are based on several factors, and the laws related to how US
> entities are run not the least of them. Suffice to say that large financial
> contributors will be less than impressed with public debates about board
> disagreements. It just sends the wrong message
> and can be misinterpreted by casual observers. These types of
> disagreements and debate are very healthy, but a public forum is
> the wrong place to air them.

Considering wikipedians elect people to the board, we hold a role
similar to that of shareholders of a company. Considered that way,
sending such essays to this list is just like the board keeping
shareholders informed about what's going on. That doesn't sound like a
problem to me.