[Foundation-l] models for adminship/wiki leadership

Mark Williamson node.ue at gmail.com
Tue Apr 10 09:32:52 UTC 2007

Well, the idea that different projects have different numbers of and
requirements for admins is certainly true.

I'm guessing you could draw up an automated list for major wikis of
what percentage of the 100 or so most prolific contributors are
admins. That could be very telling, I think.


On 10/04/07, Brianna Laugher <brianna.laugher at gmail.com> wrote:
> Delphine, I did set up such a page a while ago, for a comparison of
> "welcoming" procedures I conducted.
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cross-project_comparisons
> I also detest wiki pages for discussions (rather than collections of
> facts or links); IMO they are really not suited to the task.
> But in general my feeling is that pages on Meta mostly die sad,
> lonely, dusty deaths, and are not spontaneously updated by users from
> 250 projects as we would like to imagine. :)
> I would just like some people to share some experiences and ideas they
> have from   other wikis, since the only two I know well are English
> Wikipedia and Commons.
> cheers
> Brianna
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Refije dirije lanmè yo paske nou posede pwòp bato.

More information about the foundation-l mailing list