[Foundation-l] Corporate vanity policy enforcement
geni
geniice at gmail.com
Fri Sep 29 17:53:36 UTC 2006
On 9/29/06, Brad Patrick <bradp.wmf at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Brad Patrick wrote:
> > Dear Community:
> >
> > The volume of corporate vanity/vandalism which is showing up on
> > Wikipedia is overwhelming. At the office, we are receiving dozens of
> > phone calls *per week* about company, organization, and marketing
> > edits which are reverted, causing the non-notable, but
> > self-aggrandizing authors, to scream bloody murder. This is as it
> > should be. However, I am issuing a call to arms to the community to
> > act in a much more draconian fashion in response to corporate
> > self-editing and vanity page creation. This is simply out of hand,
> > and we need your help.
> >
Srticles are only one problem. There are aparently people prepared to
pay money to people ho can get links into wikipedia.
> > We are the #14 website in the world. We are a big target. If we are
> > to remain true to our encyclopedic mission, this kind of nonsense
> > cannot be tolerated. This means the administrators and new page
> > patrol need to be clear when they see new usernames and page creation
> > which are blatantly commercial - shoot on sight. There should be no
> > question that someone who claims to have a "famous movie studio" and
> > has exactly 2 Google hits - both their Myspace page - they get nuked.
> > Ban users who promulgate such garbage for a significant period of
> > time. They need to be encouraged to avoid the temptation to recreate
> > their article, thereby raising the level of damage and wasted time
> > they incur.
> >
This would be covered by CSD a7 for the most part.
> > Some of you might think regular policy and VfD is the way to go. I am
> > here to tell you it is not enough. We are losing the battle for
> > encyclopedic content in favor of people intent on hijacking Wikipedia
> > for their own memes. This scourge is a serious waste of time and
> > energy. We must put a stop to this now.
> > Thank you for your help.
Afd. In theory prod/CSD should take care of most of it. Problem is
that figureing out the notibility or whatever of companies is a pain
in the neck since most of us don't have a vast amount of experence in
that area.
--
geni
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list