[Foundation-l] Verifiability: Constitution? Question for Jimbo!

[Christoph Seydl]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I agree with Andre. The rules [[w:en:Verifiability]] are very strict.
Who is deviant (better word than pathological)? The people who try to
enforce the established rules or the people who ignore them? In a big
community, it doesn't work to refer just to common sense because common
sense is POV. Everyone defines common sense differently.

If you are not satisfied with the rules, try to change them. If there
are no rules how to deal with the daily conflicts, try to establish
legitimate rules.

/Chris


Andre Engels wrote:
> Well, YOU are the one who said it was 'a sign of deletability', not
> me. And if you want to apply it different from pathologically or not
> at all, it is you who are to come with a different approach. Either
> you apply it or you don't. You can't have your cake and eat it too.
> Sure, you can make rules as to when to apply it and when not. But then
> you have to state the rules.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFDpztWd9v/DFhszsRAsa8AJ9fInwtRzb4ETNSpw3FzeR7dZruoQCfZHXN
YO3ZMXa8fZTupc8oPqz9Vbg=
=546E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----