[Foundation-l] Hi, Jimmy Wales, Is there inspectors to investigate admins?

[effe iets anders]

If your question can be shortened to "are the admins controlled" the
answer is YES! To be exact, by the comunity. The community can appoint
and send away admins, and can control them.

further there is at the dutch wikipedia (and we are somehow weird,
fyi) a community reprepresentative that has access to the
sysop-mailinglist and could shout alarm if the admins were plotting
something bad. Afaik he has never had to use his access to shout
alarm, although he reads almost everything on-list.


@domas: I started earlier, here: "In Japanese Wikipedia all admins
seemes to be anti-Japanese cruel Korean fascists." ;-)

Lodewijk

2006/9/10, Peter Rocky7 <freudianjungianp at hotmail.com>:
> Greetings
>
> I am [[User:Rocky7]].
>
> Is there inspectors to investigate the behaviors of all admins in English
> Wikipedia?
>
> In Japanese Wikipedia there is no inspectors to investigate whether the
> behaviors of admins are right or not, so almost Japanese Wikipedians cannot
> trust admins at all. And it seems very clear that admins abuse sockpuppets
> terribly unfairly. They have been blocking superior Wikipedians one after
> another. They would have done out of jealousy, inferiority complex, and/or
> anti-Japanese hate.
>
> In Japanese Wikipedia all admins seemes to be anti-Japanese cruel Korean
> fascists. They cannot be Japanese characteristically. It is the fact that in
> Korea anti-Japanese cruel Korean fascists have been oppressing pro-Japanese
> people since 2000.
>
> Japanese are peaceful and generous, but Koreans are aggressive and sly (at
> least since 1945).
>
> Why have the server of Japanese Wikipedia been set on Korea? Very heavy and
> terribly unfair!
>
> Who have left the adminships of Japanese Wikipedia to sly anti-Japanese
> Koreans who pretend to be Japanese?
>
> The relation between Japanese and Koreans is the same as that between
> Israeli Jews and (Palestinian) Arabs.
>
> Is there the board of inspectors to investigate the behaviours of all admins
> in English Wikipedia?
> If not, please create it. Now!
> As far as admin's vandalism abusing ordinary Wikipedians is left, it is
> extremely obvious that there is no use preventing anons from creating new
> pages.  The prank like that of [[Siegenthaler Sr]] cannot be settled unless
> admins be re-elected and trusted.
>
> As long as general Wikipedians cannot respect admins, it's the worst method
> to set a limit to releasing the newest version of the article. I don't know
> why the admins of Deutche Wikipedia can take such a silly countermeasure.
>
> After all, The Problem of Wikipedia is evidently the Problem of Admins.
>
> Do you understand?
>
> I hope that there would be wise admins here who can think and act logically
> and help build the ideal of Jimmy Wales.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Rocky7
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get the new Windows Live Messenger!
> http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-us&source=wlmailtagline
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>