[Foundation-l] Report from Frankfurt – October 2006
Tomek "Polimerek" Ganicz
polimerek at gmail.com
Thu Oct 26 15:57:47 UTC 2006
> I will spare you all the details and instead give a summarized list
> urgent to-do topics agreed upon (mind you, since they imply
> these begin with a ''verb''), in alphabetical order:
But the problem is that indeed these details are the things which you
seem to really discussed. For example if there was a discussion about
organizational structure of the Foundation, what kind a structure do you
recommend? If you were discussing about expanding the Board, what was
your recommendation about it?
>Did you ever try a complex voting system with wikimedians IRL? I
> can tell you this is fun, not just the voting, but also, just like
If you were voting on something what was the results of these votings?
What do you exactly voted?
> Anxious for the further implementation of the hard work we did together, as
> well as for the follow-up so many hope will take place, I am confident that
> the first step of solidifying the "giant's feet of clay" into some more
> sustainable substance was in fact taken properly. Yet it is a first step and
> many more must follow on the same path, which will step by step involve many
> more people than the 21 at Frankfurt last weekend. Our main goals remain
> unchallenged, although the exact wording may vary slightly, so we need your
> help as well throughout the next stages of reorganization and expansion.
Well.. good to hear you still need other people help, but how we can
help if we don't know what have you exactly decided during this meeting...
>...all of these were at the end of the meeting "given into the hands
of >the board",
Does it mean you have produced some sort of document with your
recommendations to the Board? If yes, I think, this document, even if
very long, would be much more interesting to read, than all the above
general, abstract statements wich in fact says nothing...
Tomasz "Polimerek" Ganicz
More information about the foundation-l