[Foundation-l] Good example; The works of Charles Darwin freed :)

geni geniice at gmail.com
Sat Oct 21 17:35:59 UTC 2006

On 10/21/06, Ray Saintonge <saintonge at telus.net> wrote:
> Thanks.  I wonder how much of it is enforceable.  Of course it only
> relates to film and videos.  It does not appear to cover text or still
> photographs.

The lisence for those is pretty much identical I just can'r find it on the web.

> For specific observations: the Museum copyrights in 3.1 would not
> operate to restore copyrights that had already expired.

Under UK law that may not be the case

>  Section 3.6
> assigning one's own copyrights to the IWM seems to be way over the top.

Considering how much you have to pay to get your hands on the material yes.


More information about the foundation-l mailing list