[Foundation-l] the easy way or the less easy way

Ray Saintonge saintonge at telus.net
Tue Jun 20 20:05:39 UTC 2006


Michael R. Irwin wrote:

>Erik Zachte wrote
>  
>
>>Oh, an important clarification.
>>Naturally, appointed may be from outside of the community or from the 
>>community. On this matter, Angela, Jimbo and myself agree that at least 
>>the majority should be from the community.
>>
>>The major benefit of "appointed" is there is more chance to get a united 
>>team with complementary skills.
>>The major drawback is to risk similar-thinking people and limit 
>>diversity of view points.
>>    
>>
>Another risk is that the expertise and skills that are available in the 
>community will view all Wikimedia Foundation activities as the 
>responsibilities and problems of the Board.  Volunteers not happy with 
>how the governing/management structure is arrived at may simply continue 
>to decline to participate other than within their chosen spheres of 
>influence within specific projects.
>
The same thing can be said of those who are happy with the governance.  
They can feel no need to tinker with what they feel to be going well.

Ec




More information about the foundation-l mailing list