[Foundation-l] Dutch moderators destroy evidence of checkuser abuse

[sannse]

Frankly - if you don't want your IP address to appear on the block log, 
then don't break the rules by using sockpuppets to circumvent a ban.

I'm sorry Waerth, but from all I've read here - you are the one in the 
wrong.  Checking where the sockpuppets were coming from, and blocking 
the address shown, are normal and correct.

(And this is a local issue, I think it should go to local mailing lists now)

--sannse

Erik van den Muijzenberg wrote:
> On 16-jun-2006, at 15:35, Jan Kulveit wrote:
> 
>> As I understand it, the core of the complain may be in the fact,  
>> Waerths
>> ip address was effectively released public, as it appeareed in  
>> block log.
>>> From the circumstances and whois record showing its in Thailnd,
>> outside observer can associate the revealed ip and Waerth (yes, with
>> some level of doubt).
> 
> Ironically, if Waerth had not complained, nobody would have known it
> was his IP-address. After all it was just a Thailand-based IP-address.
> Nobody could know for sure it was Waerths.
> 
> 
> +++Muijz
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> 
>