[Foundation-l] Would you consider being on the Board?

[Anthere]

There is no conflict.
If you did not agree, you would not have had supported hiring a ceo ;-)

ant

Jimmy Wales wrote:
> Just in case anyone might misunderstand the following as suggesting a
> conflict between Anthere and myself, I agree with her completely on all
> points. :)
> 
> Anthere wrote:
> 
>>I strongly believe the CEO should not be on the board. It seems to make 
>>sense in small organisations, but I would say it is not suitable in our 
>>case.
>>
>>Doubly when the CEO is not only on the board, but also the chair of that 
>>board.
>>
>>And triply (if that term exist) when the CEO not only is the chair of 
>>the board, but also the foundator of the leading project.
>>
>>It raises the issue of
>>1) suitability of the CEO (not chosen per his executive abilities in the 
>>first place)
>>2) availability of the CEO for day to day tasks
>>3) performance assessment of the CEO (since he is giving tasks to 
>>himself and assessing his performance himself)
>>4) Relevance of the board existence
>>
>>ant
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>foundation-l mailing list
>>foundation-l at wikimedia.org
>>http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l