[Foundation-l] ..

[Michael Bimmler]

We could start a nice ToFU discussion...

On 7/18/06, Oldak Quill <oldakquill at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not so sure. There's only so much one (or all) can say about a
> blank message. The only chance for the continuation of this thread
> would be some kind of tangent. Open source and spam have been
> mentioned, but no one took the bait. So, what will it be?
>
> On 18/07/06, Sean Whitton <sean at silentflame.com> wrote:
> > It's not unpleasant, this little conversation. We could keep going.
> >
> > On 18/07/06, valdelli at bluemail.ch <valdelli at bluemail.ch> wrote:
> > > It could be... nothing else to do?
> > >
> > > Ilario
> > >
> > > ----Messaggio originale----
> > > Da: messedrocker at gmail.com
> > > Data: 17.07.2006 7.34
> > > A: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List"<foundation-l at wikimedia.org>
> > > Oggetto: Re: [Foundation-l] ..
> > >
> > > It's incredible how much conversation there is sorrounding a blank
> > > message.
> > >
> > > On 7/17/06, Jeffrey V. Merkey <jmerkey at wolfmountaingroup.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > foundation-l mailing list
> > > foundation-l at wikimedia.org
> > > http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >         —Xyrael ~ <xyr>
> >                 sean at silentflame.com | xyrael.net
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l at wikimedia.org
> > http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
>
>
> --
> Oldak Quill (oldakquill at gmail.com)
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>