[Foundation-l] Offering Wikibooks content for sale

[Austin Hair]

On 7/12/06, Ray Saintonge <saintonge at telus.net> wrote:
> Some of this may be fine for "official" Wikimedia publications, but a
> general policy of requiring approval for all third party versions would
> strike me as contrary to copyleft principles.

I don't see anyone proposing any limitation on free reuse; rather,
given the choice between an "official" Wikimedia publication at a fair
price and a dirt-cheap unedited screen dump, which would you buy?

Austin