[Foundation-l] Re: Stewards policy proposal

[- Essjay -]

I agree with the original statement: Desysopping should be discussed on the
project where the user is an admin. If it is done on Meta, it will prevent a
wide section of that project's community from commenting, and having wide
community input is essential in determining whether to remove admin rights
or not (as admin rights are the result of a community's trust of a given
user). Unless the discussion is about desysoping a meta admin, or
destewarding a steward, it should be done on the project where the rights
are assigned.

Essjay

On 1/30/06, Mihai Floran <mihai at emma.ro> wrote:
>
> >Besides what steward(s) should do, I propose that no discussion on
> >desysopping has not to be submitted on meta but on their own projects
> >unless desysopping in request is related to two or more projects, or
> >at least such discussion might be moved to more appropriate page (like
> >requests for comment).
> >
> >Or, submission of request for desysopping might be qualified only if
> >there is already a closed vote on project(s) in question. (sigh)
>
> I agree. There should be no discutions at Requests for permisions. There
> should be just approved requests which have to be done. Maybe we shuld have
> a special page for this kind of discutions? It is an idea with Requests for
> comment. If not, we can do another page.
>
> M
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>



--
Essjay
-----
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Essjay
Wikipedia:The Free Encyclopedia
http://www.wikipedia.org/