[Foundation-l] Re: GFDL Version issue: Can simply syncing GFDL Licence document solve GFDL version imcompatibility?

[Kernigh]

PiaCarrot <nao-yuki at ...> writes:  
  
> Each article on most editions on wikipedia are licenced under  
> "GFDL 1.2 or later", but articles on ja.wp are currently licenced  
> under "GFDL 1.1 or later". 
This means that you cannot translate articles from en.wikipedia (and some 
others) to ja.wikipedia. 
 
> If licence on ja.wp shifted to "GFDL 1.2 or later" simply,  
> can their "Duplicated articles and images" be relieved  
> from  GFDL version imcompatibility because article 9 of  
> GFDL licence? 
I was planning to eventually propose such a shift for en.wikisource and 
en.wikiquote. Both projects, plus sep11.wikipedia, all currently use "GFDL" 
without a version number (effectively the same as "GFDL 1.1 or later") for 
everything (project pages, talk pages) except sources and quotes. However, some 
of the project pages are adaptations from en.wikipedia. 
 
-- [[Wikibooks:en:User:Kernigh]]