[Juriwiki-l] Re: [Foundation-l] Copyright complaints
kim at bruning.xs4all.nl
Sun Feb 12 00:25:06 UTC 2006
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 08:59:02PM +0100, Kim Bruning wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 12:23:34PM -0500, Patrick, Brad wrote:
> > To editors on en.wp in particular, don't hesitate to take action on
> > copyvio. It is better to err on the side of caution and aggressively
> > delete. The license problem is as much an educational problem as an
> > actual systemic copyvio problem.
> While I thank you for that statement, it's not yet sufficient.
Oh dear, in fact, I originally was going to make this statement
somewhat stronger, along the lines of that people would respond "why
should we listen to some lawyer on some mailing list" and basically
ignore what you were saying.
I deleted that because I thought it'd be too inflammatory to
seriously put on the list.
In the mean time however, reality has caught up with me:
See especially the comments by Mel Etitis, and also note Jkelly.
[Non-pgp mail clients may show pgp-signature as attachment]
gpg (www.gnupg.org) Fingerprint for key FEF9DD72
5ED6 E215 73EE AD84 E03A 01C5 94AC 7B0E FEF9 DD72
More information about the foundation-l