[Foundation-l] English Wikipedia ethnocentric policy affects other communities
birgitte_sb at yahoo.com
Wed Dec 20 13:50:08 UTC 2006
--- David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 20/12/06, Gerard Meijssen
> <gerard.meijssen at gmail.com> wrote:
> > What Aphaia means is that people have asked to
> change their Japanese
> > name because of the insistence of the English
> project that people have a
> > Latin name. With the long hoped for single login
> this policy of the
> > English Wikipedia HAS to go the way of the
> dinosaur. It is unfortunate
> > that this policy is still active.
> Ah, got it. In that case, Aphaia may care to post to
> wikien-l or to
> the various anti-vandalism pages on en:wp where the
> policy is
> implemented ... not to a list which very few en:wp
> editors actually
> read, as I believe was pointed out to her last time
> this came up.
> That is: actually make a slight effort to convince
> the people involved
> by consensus, rather than appearing to demand
> top-down imposition of a
> new policy on a wiki by the Foundation. That trick
> is somewhat less
> likely to work.
> - d.
Why are you assuming there has been not even a slight
effort to convince people?
That is: read the policy talk page
Perhaps before you criticize people for coming here
with a problem you could ask them what steps have
already been taken. Then you will be better informed
to make reccomendations. A slight effort to convince
people has had no effect. If someone can come up with
actual numbers of people who are currently editing
en.WP as anons with non-latin usernames in their home
wikis, people might be more willing to listen.
Although at least one person does not believe it is a
hardship to ask these people to log out to edit en.WP.
Information about how exactly user creation logs will
implemented would also help the discussion progress.
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
More information about the foundation-l