[Foundation-l] Adult and Illegal content on Wikimedia projects

[Robert Scott Horning]

Gavin Chait wrote:

>Take this a little further, though.  A "guide" to terrorism (or rape for 
>that matter) exposes how the "trick" is performed and so allows others to 
>come up with strategies to combat that act.
>
>The question, of course, is whether or not that ups the game.  Every new 
>computer virus that comes out has to get through an ever more sophisticated 
>set of virus scanners and so there is an evolutionary process.
>
>But the terrorist attack of September 11 already upped that game.  Surely it 
>is helpful to know how terrorists and other nutcases plan their attacks so 
>that we, who are not homicidal, can at least have some insight into how the 
>other side thinks?
>
>Gavin 
>
>  
>
Thank you for expressing your opinion on this matter.  I would like to 
point out, however, that it is opinions like this that seem to encourage 
this type of content to remain, and is at odds with what Jimbo seems to 
have been saying that this should be deleted immediately without even a 
VfD vote as a form of vandalism.  This is exactly the dilemma that I'm 
facing right now, to completely ignore opinions like this one above or 
to take it into consideration to form a community concensus.

-- 
Robert Scott Horning