[Foundation-l] Rodovid.org, family tree wiki, wishes to become a wiki project
Robert Scott Horning
robert_horning at netzero.net
Sat Apr 1 13:28:03 UTC 2006
Benjamin Webb wrote:
>What about if you wanted to have yourself on a family tree could you do
>that? (See my prewious comment)
>
>On 31/03/06, Robert Scott Horning <robert_horning at netzero.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Ray Saintonge wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Simply asking a person's permission would simply lead to chaos. The
>>>person whom you ask may agree, but his brother may not. A 110 year rule
>>>may be a little excessive. The US census, for example, is in the public
>>>domain after 72 years. BMD announcements in newspapers are all a matter
>>>of public record; telephone directories, property tax records and the
>>>Social Security Death Index are all publicly available sources of
>>>information.
>>>
>>>Ec
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>The point of the 110 rule is that it does fit with almost all known
>>privacy laws throughout the world, and for geneological research
>>purposes is generally not that big of an inconvience.
>>
Yourself, perhaps. I understand in part that you want to show a full
family tree starting with yourself and going to your ancestors (or
decendants if you are older). The problem here is that this information
is all going to be publicly available for anybody to use and have
access. Indeed, a very, very common "security question" used to help
prevent identity theft is to ask what your mother's maiden name was. By
publishing full geneological links in a public place like on a Wikimedia
project, you are inviting fraud, identity theft, and violation of
several personal privacy laws. With the Wikimedia Foundation so
paranoid about something so insignificant as an IP address connected to
a user account and the hyper paranoid (in my opinion) check user policy,
this might be enough to kill this whole proposal completely in terms of
violating privacy laws.
More important, the suggestion here is that other living relatives may
also be listed if a policy like this isn't implemented. They did not
give concent to have their information posted in a public forum, even if
on a technical level the information is available through public records
like birth certificates and driver's license registrations.
I completely agree that this is a sticky issue. I'm just suggesting
that some thought needs to go into it and I'm also suggesting what other
groups are doing who publish geneological information in a public forum.
--
Robert Scott Horning
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list