[Foundation-l] Re: license evolution

Jean-Baptiste Soufron jbsoufron at gmail.com
Sat May 21 18:49:36 UTC 2005


>
>> Also it would be very important for wikipedia to provide its own   
>> license and to allow it to evolve. As a policy matter, I don't   
>> believe it's really safe to leave your legal needs within the  
>> hands  of others like we did with the GNU/FDL (and it would be the  
>> same  problem with CC).
>>
>
> I'm not sure that a wholly new license, especially one unique to  
> Wikipedia, is such a good idea. In the software world, there are  
> already many complaints about the existence of too many "open  
> source" licenses. The problem may not be quite as great outside of  
> software, but even sorting through just the options available from  
> Creative Commons can be a little challenging, and they heard some  
> concerns about license proliferation when announcing their new CC- 
> Wiki license (Lessig says it's different "brand" rather than a  
> different license).
>
> I think it would be better for us to focus on figuring out how to  
> revise the GFDL, including working up draft proposals ourselves as  
> appropriate. While it's occasionally suggested that there are  
> ongoing talks with FSF and/or CC, perhaps we sometimes expect  
> there's more going on than there really is. Jimbo would hardly have  
> the time to be focusing on these issues constantly, and it's not  
> his field of expertise (the same is true of Richard Stallman, for  
> that matter). Actually generating ideas for them to consider might  
> yield more results.
>
> However, I think branching out completely on our own would require  
> too great an investment of resources. Achieving absolute  
> independence is an appealing sentiment, but the FSF and CC have  
> experience and understanding in this area that would be valuable  
> for us to draw upon. Working with other organizations on these  
> issues also contributes to being a responsible member of the larger  
> free-software/content community.

Well, I am not afraid of being faced with a great number of licenses,  
but I am afraid of poorly designed ones. Except that, I agree with  
you, there is no need to "fork" from other licensors but we should be  
really become more involved in the processes. Either with CC or with  
the FSF.



More information about the foundation-l mailing list