[Foundation-l] Re: Development tasks and project needs

[Sj]

In a similar vein, what reasons are there for not hosting each project
on its own server?  Especially if we have extra small boxes lying
around.  It would be most gratifying if only one project went down at
a time, and if smaller projects were never slowed down by database
locking issues on the larger ones.

SJ


On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:14:33 -0800, Michael Snow
<wikipedia at earthlink.net> wrote:
> I'm close to being out of my depth on some of this discussion, but
> perhaps somebody would be able to explain for me. A few people have
> raised the possibility that what is technically desirable on one project
> may not be so on another.

-- 
+sj+