[Foundation-l] conflict resolution at meta

[Gerard Meijssen]

Andre Engels wrote:

>I would like to get the question about conflict resolution at meta
>raised again, again about the same issue. For a moment it seemed to
>have been resolved by moving the desirability of image suppression to
>a separate page, but that page has now also become the subject of an
>edit war. Christiaan is reverting Gerard because his arguments 'show
>bad faith' (which apparently is a reason to forbid them being spoken),
>Gerard reverts Christiaan because his edits are 'vandalism' and 'not
>NPOV'.
>
>Apparently the two are not only disagreeing about whether image
>suppression is a good idea, but even about which arguments against it
>are acceptable enough to be on meta. Who can resolve this conflict?
>
>Andre Engels
>
As far as I am concerned, it is not possible to discuss this. So I 
stopped discussing it. This subject is apparantly taboo and that is fine 
with me. I have not editted it for quite some time and under the present 
circumstances I do intend to. I would not mind if their was arbitration 
because I am quite sad about the way this whole thing evolved.

Thanks,
    GerardM