[Foundation-l] Re: Expanding CheckUser permissions

[Puddl Duk]

> 
> I would not support any such list to be public. It seems to me that
> bringing public suspicion over someone is already a bit condemning him.
> This is not wikilove at all, and prone to further heat conflicts.
> 
> Another solution could simply be to name two people ombudsmen over this
> topic. We should choose two people trusted by the community, BUT
> generally out of usual cabalistic discussions. Rather quiet and discreet
> people, not involved in current internal politics. These are most likely
> to be independant from those with the right to check the ips.
> 
> Ant
> 
Secrecy checked by more secrecy. This is going in the wrong direction.
A user should be notified some way when they are targeted for
investigated.