[ComProj] Projects templated, just awaiting status updates.

[Sean Whitton]

On 09/09/2007, Gerald A <geraldablists at gmail.com> wrote:
[snip]
> Also, I'm thinking projects should all live in the "project" sub-namespace,
> but there are a few that are just hanging off "CPG". Are these older
> initiatives which are just going to be grandfathered, or should we consider
> moving the few not under projects to the "new" spot?

Yes. Let's get them all moved; this makes a lot more sense. They are
our projects, so put them in that space. Or, of course, we could move
them all out, but I think this would be less clear.

On 09/09/2007, Casey Brown <cbrown1023.ml at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/9/07, Gerald A <geraldablists at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 9/9/07, Sean Whitton <sean at silentflame.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Okay, none of them have PMs that I can see, so moving all to pending.
> >
> >
> > I think we should also consider adding CPG priorities to projects, so both
> > members and PMs know what is important and what isn't.
> >
> Bring this up at the next meeting, not here. :-)

I think it's quite fine to discuss things here in between meetings.
Certain discussion topics often work better on IRC, others on mailing
lists :-)

I think this idea could be useful but we do have deadlines, and also
the announcements of the project will generally make it clear.
However, we could always add it as an option.