[ComProj] Logo

[Dan Collins]

http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Wikimedia_visual_identity_guidelinesstates
that approval is needed for letterheads and business cards, which
seems to imply that casual use of the logo doesn't require approval, nor
does anything on that page imply that it is. Additionally, that logo does
meet the requirements as far as I can see, 60% black subtext, at 60% of the
size of the main text, in DevaVu Sans. (it seems GIMP decided to make it
40%, the attached version corrects this, and if you're referring to the
spacing, the version I downloaded didn't have that much spacing, and I
interpreted the guideline as stating there should be that much of a margin
in printed versions)

On 9/4/07, Guillaume Paumier <guillom.pom at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On 9/4/07, Dan Collins <en.wp.st47 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I believe foundation policy states only that business cards may not be
> > issued without consent, but the logo can be used freely. Attached is such a
> > logo.
>
>
> Please point me to the policy saying this. Besides, the logo you proposed
> doesn't follow our visual identity guidelines:
> http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Wikimedia_visual_identity_guidelines
>
> I don't see the point of having a localized Wikimedia logo for an
> unofficial workgroup (actually, I don't see the point of having a logo for
> ComProj at all, but that's another story). You don't need any logo to do
> good work. Who are the "outsiders" you want to show your logo?
>
> --
> Guillaume Paumier
> [[m:User:guillom]]
> "Go confidently in the direction of your dreams. Live the life you have
> imagined." Henry David Thoreau
> _______________________________________________
> ComProj mailing list
> ComProj at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/comproj
>
>


-- 
ST47
Administrator, en.wikipedia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/comproj/attachments/20070904/df689e32/attachment.htm