[ComProj] Logo

[Casey Brown]

Looks really good! :-)  I know we can use the logo, but I think Greeves was
talking about how it would appear to outsiders if we used the logo.  We
don't want to look too official because we need to remind everyone that we
aren't. :-)

On 9/3/07, Dan Collins <en.wp.st47 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I believe foundation policy states only that business cards may not be
> issued without consent, but the logo can be used freely. Attached is such a
> logo.
>
> On 9/3/07, Mitchell <mduce at mts.net> wrote:
> >
> >  Right now, the logo on the project banner is the Wikipedia Contact Us
> > logo. I don't think that our logo should include the Wikipedia logo unless
> > we include the logos for other projects. Any thoughts on what a new logo
> > could be? My first though was to do it like Wikimedia Chapters, (like the
> > Wikimedia Foundation logo, but replacing "Foundation" with "Communication
> > Projects Group" spaced out on two lines) but would that be seen as too
> > official?
> >
> >
> >
> > ____________________
> >
> > Mitch D. (Greeves on all English Wikimedia projects)
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ComProj mailing list
> > ComProj at lists.wikimedia.org
> > http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/comproj
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> ST47
> Administrator, en.wikipedia
> _______________________________________________
> ComProj mailing list
> ComProj at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/comproj
>
>
>


-- 
Casey Brown
Cbrown1023

---
Note:  This e-mail address is used for mailing lists.  Personal emails sent
to
this address will probably get lost.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/comproj/attachments/20070903/e3a0e90b/attachment-0001.htm