[Commons-l] Proposal for an allrightsreserved.wikimedia.org website
Blurpeace
blurpeace at gmail.com
Wed Feb 2 00:30:41 UTC 2011
But. there's no reason why the two should be technically separated. It's
already been practically divided by categories. It's not considered
unnecessary faff just by techs; any pragmatic person would agree.
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:03 PM, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1 February 2011 23:41, Gnangarra <gnangarra at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Why would these images even need a wiki, these images are the property of
> > the foundation if they are such a big concern to Commons Community, (I've
> > been on common for a few years and was not aware of real concerns about
> > those images) then the Foundation should address the issue.
>
>
> There have been slight concerns over the years, with a small number of
> people greatly concerned that Commons carries non-free WMF utility
> images as well as the free media.
>
> This is a reasonable viewpoint to hold. But no, I agree with you -
> mostly people aren't that worried.
>
> I note only that technically it would be feasible, the idea would just
> be considered unnecessary faff by most of the people who'd be involved
> in actually doing the work.
>
>
> - d.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Commons-l mailing list
> Commons-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/commons-l/attachments/20110201/3be98a85/attachment.htm
More information about the Commons-l
mailing list