[Commons-l] Some reflections about the governance of Commons

[Geoffrey Plourde]

If commons is not a service project, what is it? Unlike other projects which have a measurable output, Commons' sole function appears to be as a repository of free images. It is therefore very much a service project as it serves other projects through storage of images. 

I think the discussion here is especially important as this is the Wikimedia Commons discussion list. That being said, I feel that there should be an RfC/Poll on Commons about how it should change. 




________________________________
From: Huib Laurens <Abigor at forgotten-beauty.com>
To: Wikimedia Commons Discussion List <commons-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 10:34:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Commons-l] Some reflections about the governance of Commons

Hello,

I don't think we need to see Commons as a Service project, All Wikimedia 
projects need the other projects.
Wikimedia is build on all the projects and saying that a project is only 
a service project can make the people feel bad that are working on that 
project.
I think the view that Rama uses can be seen in a lot of ways, and 
regarding the point of view that you uses you can make all projects into 
a service project.

We have now a discussion in  a "private" place about how people have to 
change Commons, isn't it a better idea to make this a discussion on 
Commons or on Meta (if you want a neutral place). Commons has a great 
communety with people that are spending all there time on Commons, and 
whe have photographers that can easely make money with there pictures 
but chooses to release it under a free license.. I rather see a onwiki 
discussion so we can hear there say's also..

Just my view here but I cant send the email without a notice about this..

I'm seeing a discussions or even multible discussions about how Commons 
needs to change to be a better service project. But when Commons needs 
to change, will we change all other projects also? There are still 
images getting deleted because we couldn't get the source information or 
other important information because the file was already deleted local, 
there is a bug to give Commons adminstrators view permission for deleted 
files globally, there has been a vote on Meta and still it isn't 
activated (more than a year waiting time). Things like that will make 
Commons also a better service project.. Or isn't that important enough?

Huib



_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l at lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/commons-l/attachments/20090615/4f91e34b/attachment-0001.htm