[Commons-l] Commons licensing for chapter-owned copyrights

David Gerard dgerard at gmail.com
Thu Jun 4 18:19:20 UTC 2009


2009/6/4 Robert Rohde <rarohde at gmail.com>:

> My personal opinion is that non-free materials owned by the Foundation
> (or chapters, or other authorized uses, etc) should really be shunted
> to a separate repository with Commons reserved for truly free works.


This has been proposed more than once and rejected.

If our mailing list archives were searchable in Google I'd track down
what the rationales for the rejections were ... does anyone remember
off the top of their heads?


- d.



More information about the Commons-l mailing list