[Commons-l] Should we use CC-Plus? (CC+)
Platonides
Platonides at gmail.com
Tue Jan 1 23:57:32 UTC 2008
Brianna Laugher wrote:
> So the question is not should we allow it (we have no reason not to), but
> - should we actively encourage people to use it, instead of personal
> "contact me for X" statements?
>
> Basically the only point of using CC+ instead of personal statements
> is because CC+ is intended to be a standard.
> This is not an issue where the benefits of standardisation are hugely
> obvious to me, so I am not too fussed about this, but maybe some
> people have strong feelings about it.
>
> If you use a personal contact statement, is there any reason you
> wouldn't switch to a standardised CC+ statement with an equivalent
> statement?
>
> cheers,
> Brianna
> user:pfctdayelise
Standarising with a template? Ok.
Using that image? No.
Using rel="cc:morePermissions" ? Maybe, but you'd need an extension just
to add that, plus if it's only listing an email it's useless. We don't
have personal statements to add with it. There would be a point in
tagging GFDL as cc:morePermissions, but IMHO may seem that GFDL is "less
important" that the CC one.
Proposals:
a) Create template: "If this set of permissions doesn't fit your needs,
[[contact me]]..." which also means that the uploader is willing to
atend such requests.
b) Start discussion about using CC metadata. It also involves technical
difficulties in doing so without killing the servers or being killed by
domas ;-)
More information about the Commons-l
mailing list