[Commons-l] [Wikitech-l] Audio file sizes
Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijssen at gmail.com
Wed Mar 7 14:29:04 UTC 2007
Hoi,
Using loss less audio is particularly relevant for the recordings of
pronunciations. For ordinary use having them compressed in a lossy way
is not a problem. The point is that with the Shtooka software that
became available, we are in a position to easily create large amounts of
sound files. These are of relevance to scientists and they have a need
for loss less files. Given that the only identified reason to have loss
less soundfiles ARE the pronunciations, the current upload size would
suffice. They are in effect single words at most a sentence.
Thanks,
GerardM
Edward Z. Yang schreef:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>
>> What I'd like to see us do instead, is to ask uploaders to send us
>> losslessly compressed Ogg/Flac files instead. Lossless compression
>> because disk space isn't totally irrelevant and to avoid people
>> downloading insanely huge wavs just because they don't want to use the
>> java player or install a codec. We already permit uploading these
>> lossless audio files they can be easily transcoded to Ogg/Vorbis while
>> preserving all metadata. [snip]
>>
>
> I think this is a great idea and should definitely be investigated. However:
>
> 1. Encoding audio in a lossless codec seems, at least from my
> experience, to be a very CPU intensive process. WIth our equipment,
> this may or may not be a problem.
>
> 2. If we encourage losslessly compressed audio, we will probably want to
> increase our maximum upload size. Longer audio clips will easily exceed
> 20 MB, and Spoken Wikipedia usually *must* split up their audio files in
> order to upload them in (whether for better or worse). This also runs up
> with some of HTTPs limitations when it comes to file uploads. An
> anonymous FTP server would be pretty neat, but I doubt it's going to happen.
>
More information about the Commons-l
mailing list