[Commons-l] {{Cc-by-nc-sa-2.0-dual}} and other similar licenses
Gregory Maxwell
gmaxwell at gmail.com
Sat Aug 4 22:03:02 UTC 2007
On 8/4/07, Nilfanion <nilfanion at googlemail.com> wrote:
[snip]
> Commons should not
> allow ever non-free licensing even as part of a dual license
Should we disallow PD or minimal licenses which allow later versions
to be made non-free?
I don't see how this is any worse.
I suppose you could make an argument that -nc looks more okay than it
is... and as such this is more of a problem normal licenses which
allow a work to be made non-free.
More information about the Commons-l
mailing list