[Commons-l] {{Cc-by-nc-sa-2.0-dual}} and other similar licenses

Gregory Maxwell gmaxwell at gmail.com
Sat Aug 4 22:03:02 UTC 2007


On 8/4/07, Nilfanion <nilfanion at googlemail.com> wrote:
[snip]
> Commons should not
> allow ever non-free licensing even as part of a dual license

Should we disallow PD or minimal licenses which allow later versions
to be made non-free?

I don't see how this is any worse.

I suppose you could make an argument that -nc looks more okay than it
is... and as such this is more of a problem normal licenses which
allow a work to be made non-free.



More information about the Commons-l mailing list