[Commons-l] justifying the "no NC/ND" requirement

[Adi & Nadav Perez]

If I understand correctly, every mirror that uses ads (like 
http://pedia.walla.co.il for he) is commercial usage, so NC/ND is not 
practical even now...
Nadav
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Benbennick" <dbenbenn at gmail.com>
To: "Wikimedia Commons Discussion List" <commons-l at wikimedia.org>
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 7:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Commons-l] justifying the "no NC/ND" requirement


> On 4/3/06, Brianna Laugher <brianna.laugher at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Does anyone have a really succint, persuasive argument for this?
>
> I usually point out that Ask.com is ''already'' using Wikipedia and
> Commons content for commercial purposes.  For example, the top of
> http://www.ask.com/web?q=Petersen+graph shows an image from the
> Commons.
> _______________________________________________
> Commons-l mailing list
> Commons-l at wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l