[Advocacy Advisors] Freedom of Panorama in Reda Report

[Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov]

Hi all,

Yes, adopting the Report was a roll-call vote (which means all the MEPs
names and their voting behaviour are recorded).

The Schaake amendment however wasn't. We only have the totals. The first
next step for us has to be to gather as much information on who voted how
so we can draw up a game plan for the next phase. We can either read
peoples' statements or ask them directly.

I can make an educated assumption that the EPP voted against and the S&D
was at least split. ALDE, Greens and EFDD must have voted in favour. I'd
have three first priorities that I'll try to figure out:
1. Did at least some EPPs vote for (e.g. the Polish delegation)
2. How did the S&D split occur (I assume IT & AT voted for, but what about
UK & DE?)
3. Did the ECR vote indeed for or stick with the EPP line?

Cheers,
Dimi


2015-07-10 9:48 GMT+02:00 Bence Damokos <bdamokos at gmail.com>:

> Hi,
>
> Voting list is online at
> http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2f%2fEP%2f%2fNONSGML%2bPV%2b20150709%2bRES-VOT%2bDOC%2bPDF%2bV0%2f%2fFR&language=EN
> (page 31, under §46 amendment 3 is the Shaake amendment): + 228, - 303,
> abstain: 24
>
> The result of roll call votes are here, but the amendment was not a roll
> call vote, if I see correctly:
> http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2f%2fEP%2f%2fNONSGML%2bPV%2b20150709%2bRES-RCV%2bDOC%2bPDF%2bV0%2f%2fEN&language=EN
>
> Best regards,
> Bence
>
> 2015-07-10 9:30 GMT+02:00 Tanel Pern <tanel.pern at gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi Dimi,
>>
>> Are the statistics on the votes on Schaake's amendment available
>> somewhere? The votes for dropping Cavada's text are included in the session
>> statistics but I can't find the votes on Schaake's text anywhere.
>>
>> Tanel
>>
>> 2015-07-09 14:26 GMT+03:00 Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov <
>> dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> The vote on FoP just passed.
>>>
>>> The negative text by Cavada was dropped by 502 to 40.
>>>
>>> The positive text by Schaake didn't pass by 228 to 303.
>>>
>>> The report as a whole was accepted with 445 to 65 with 32 abstentions.
>>>
>>> The question we need to discuss in Mexico is how we will tackle the
>>> Commission to propose something on FoP and what other points from the
>>> report we should focus on.
>>>
>>> Thanks everyone, we almost manage to achieve a full swing, which is a
>>> very tough feat to get done in 3 weeks.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Dimi
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
>>> Advocacy_Advisors at lists.wikimedia.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
>> Advocacy_Advisors at lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
> Advocacy_Advisors at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/advocacy_advisors/attachments/20150710/4c5d5ca9/attachment.html>