[Advocacy Advisors] Twitter v. Holder amicus brief

[Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov]

Hi Stephen,

Thanks for doing this! I do think we have an interest in this case and
questions about such letters have been raised even within our community.

The way I understand it, an amicus brief  is like a highly official letter
of support but has no palpable legal value. Do such documents play any role
for the court or is this rather targeted at the media?

Thanks!
Dimi

2015-02-18 6:56 GMT+01:00 Stephen LaPorte <slaporte at wikimedia.org>:

> Hi all,
>
> We have joined six other organizations[1] in an amicus brief[2] in Twitter
> v. Holder.[3] Twitter initiated this action against the US government to
> establish the right to publish more detailed info about the number of
> national security letters it receives in its transparency report.
>
> [1] Aautomattic, Cloudflare, CREDOMobile, Medium, Sonic, and Wickr.
> [2]
> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/foundation/5/54/Twitter_v_Holder_amicus.pdf
> [3] https://www.eff.org/cases/twitter-v-holder
>
> --
> Stephen LaPorte
> Legal Counsel
> Wikimedia Foundation
>
> *NOTICE: This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you
> have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the
> mistake. As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal and ethical
> reasons, I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community
> members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity. For more
> on what this means, please see our legal disclaimer
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Legal_Disclaimer>.*
>
> _______________________________________________
> Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
> Advocacy_Advisors at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/advocacy_advisors/attachments/20150218/42cf9455/attachment.html>