[Advocacy Advisors] Fair use for legal briefs

[Maggie Dennis]

Personally, I'm unfamiliar with any such. Wikipedia's stance, so far as I
know, has always been that judgments are copyright free and that other
documents are subject to the non-free content policy and guideline.

Maggie


On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Stephen LaPorte <slaporte at wikimedia.org>wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> Here is a ruling in New York about fair use for legal briefs and other
> court filings:
>
> http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Legal/News/2013/02_-_February/Copyright_suit_dismissed_against_Lexis,_Westlaw/
>
> Does anyone know of any recent on-wiki discussions about fair use analysis
> of court documents?
>
> --
> Stephen LaPorte
> Legal Counsel
> Wikimedia Foundation
>
> *This message might have confidential or legally privileged information
> in it. If you have received this message by accident, please delete it and
> let us know about the mistake. For legal reasons, I may only serve as an
> attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation. This means I may not give legal
> advice to or serve as a lawyer for community members, volunteers, or staff
> members in their personal capacity.*
>
> _______________________________________________
> Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
> Advocacy_Advisors at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors
>
>


-- 
Maggie Dennis
Community Liaison
WikimediaFoundation.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/advocacy_advisors/attachments/20130215/4ef1a1a0/attachment.html>