<!DOCTYPE html>
<html><head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head><body><p><br></p><blockquote type="cite">On 02 August 2020 at 16:16 Grounder UK <grounderuk@gmail.com> wrote: </blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><div>But we don't just want the answer, we want a quiz! Equally, maybe we don't just want the question and the answer, we want some wrong answers and some tips. </div></div></blockquote><p>It goes back to 2016, just to generate questions from Wikidata:</p><p><a href="https://pub.tik.ee.ethz.ch/students/2016-FS/BA-2016-03.pdf">https://pub.tik.ee.ethz.ch/students/2016-FS/BA-2016-03.pdf</a></p><p>Technically the incorrect answers in multiple choice are called "distractors". Clearly this is a rather simple data structure to handle. Hints assume quite a bit more.</p><p>At the beginning of 2017, I decided to take seriously the suggestion (from Magnus Manske) that questions should be treated as structured data. I even suggested Wikidata should have a namespace for them (this didn't go down well). A road not taken then, and just as the Comprende! tool was finished I got diverted into a Wikimedian in Residence position. So much for that.</p><p>Anyone, one take on this is that AW output might be some kind of structured data, rather than the sectioned prose (+media files and tables and templated data) familiar from Wikipedia.</p><p>By the way, mathematics in wikitext has traditionally been a threefold mix of approaches (HTML, png, LaTex): not an elegant solution.</p><p>Charles</p></body></html>