When is the next meeting set for? We have to give
feedback by the 30th.
Do you mean have this discussion on meta or prepare the feedback on meta?
I would like to suggest we separate feedback about the process (which I
know a lot of people are unhappy with) with the quality of the
recommendations suggested.
Best
On Mon, 22 Jun 2020, 15:08 Lane Rasberry, <lanerasberry(a)gmail.com> wrote:
This seems like a larger than typical Wikimedia
community protest on
this survey and the branding - see the attendees
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/All-Affiliates_Brand_Meeting
general recommendation from that organization - "none of the above", and
put a phrase like "keep Wikimedia Foundation and also respect community
governance" in all free form fields. The discussion was not about renaming,
but about the WMF taking a range of actions to claim the right to speak for
the Wikimedia community without the Wikimedia community.
Can we meet and take notes on this survey at next meeting? Can we
instead discuss on meta?
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 8:20 AM Jamie Flood <jamie.flood2(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I’m open to it - it would be a good way to
communicate about more
passive projects/ideas, I’d think?
I’m not familiar with either but open to checking them out/learning.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 8:18 AM Željko Blaće <zblace(a)mi2.hr> wrote:
> Yup - if document making is the goal I agree with you (etherpads are
> still missing commenting and annotating, but excellent at real-time
> collaboration)...
>
> ...but could user group start experimenting with Loomio for
> decision making and bulletin board like posting anytime soon or in midterm
> plan?
>
> Best Z
>
>
>
> On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 at 14:10, john cummings <mrjohncummings(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, I've tried to do similar things to this on a wiki and it
>> really doesn't work properly, less ability to comment, can't edit at the
>> same time, no suggested edits etc. My suggestion would be to work in the
>> Google Doc and then copy it to a meta page once done and link to the Google
>> Doc and allow people viewing to see previous versions of the page. Really
>> wish wikis would have more features like this....
>>
>> Best
>>
>> On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 at 13:24, Željko Blaće <zblace(a)mi2.hr> wrote:
>>
>>> Sounds OK - accept that we should maybe use Meta page of UG to keep
>>> process transparent - no? With these kind of things I would even
>>> suggest using Loomio for UGs, but that is not yet adopted anywhere on
>>> Wikimedia projects as far as I know.
>>>
>>> Best Z
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wren mailing list
>>> Wren(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wren
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wren mailing list
>> Wren(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wren
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Wren mailing list
> Wren(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wren
>
_______________________________________________
Wren mailing list
Wren(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wren
--
Lane Rasberry
lane(a)bluerasberry.com
user:bluerasberry
_______________________________________________
Wren mailing list
Wren(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wren
_______________________________________________
Wren mailing list
Wren(a)lists.wikimedia.org