Hello WISCOM,
Did you see this come through?
Best regards,
Woubzena
Woubzena Jifar (pronouns - she/her/hers)
Program Officer, Rapid Grants
User: WJifar (WMF)
Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <wiscom-owner(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Date: Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 12:34 PM
Subject: Wiscom post from kirill.lokshin(a)gmail.com requires approval
To: <wiscom-owner(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List: Wiscom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
From: kirill.lokshin(a)gmail.com
Subject: Thematic focus inquiry regarding Wiki In Africa
Reason: Post by non-member to a members-only list
At your convenience, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/admindb/wiscom
to approve or deny the request.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Kirill Lokshin <kirill.lokshin(a)gmail.com>
To: fnartey(a)wikimedia.org, bobbyshabangu(a)gmail.com, zeinebtakouti(a)gmail.com,
turkiabdelwaheb(a)hotmail.fr, georges_fodouop(a)yahoo.fr, Reda <
vikoula5(a)yahoo.fr>
Cc: WISCom(a)lists.wikimedia.org, Affiliations Committee list <
affcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Bcc:
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 15:33:58 -0400
Subject: Thematic focus inquiry regarding Wiki In Africa
Dear members of WISCom,
As you probably know, the Affiliations Committee is evaluating a Wikimedia
User Group application from Wiki In Africa, a non-profit voluntary
association based in South Africa with a financial and legal structure that
operates global initiatives in support of the WikiAfrica movement.
As part of the recognition process, we reached out to affiliates in Africa
to notify them of the application and to solicit their comments and
concerns with regards to the Wiki In Africa group. We received 6 comments
opposing the application and 3 supporting it (with a further 6 groups that
did not respond to the request). Based on the comments, it has become clear
that there is an issue with Wiki In Africa’s open-ended and overarching
scope and nature of activities, which may cause multiple conflicts if the
group were to be recognized in its current form.
We are therefore reaching out to you, as an elected body representing
affiliates in the region, to understand your stance on this application and
to request your help in answering the following questions:
1. What role do you perceive the Wiki In Africa group to be playing in
the region?
2. Would a more narrow thematic scope for the Wiki In Africa group be
acceptable to regional affiliates? If so, what narrowing of scope would
you recommend?
We deeply appreciate your insight and assistance in this matter as we
continue our review of this application.
Regards
Kirill Lokshin
Chair, Affiliations Committee
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: wiscom-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 19:34:16 +0000
Subject: confirm ff1247786fde8ecdddfaf7f77da5ad4c92825852
If you reply to this message, keeping the Subject: header intact,
Mailman will discard the held message. Do this if the message is
spam. If you reply to this message and include an Approved: header
with the list password in it, the message will be approved for posting
to the list. The Approved: header can also appear in the first line
of the body of the reply.
Dear members of WISCom,
As you probably know, the Affiliations Committee is evaluating a Wikimedia
User Group application from Wiki In Africa, a non-profit voluntary
association based in South Africa with a financial and legal structure that
operates global initiatives in support of the WikiAfrica movement.
As part of the recognition process, we reached out to affiliates in Africa
to notify them of the application and to solicit their comments and
concerns with regards to the Wiki In Africa group. We received 6 comments
opposing the application and 3 supporting it (with a further 6 groups that
did not respond to the request). Based on the comments, it has become clear
that there is an issue with Wiki In Africa’s open-ended and overarching
scope and nature of activities, which may cause multiple conflicts if the
group were to be recognized in its current form.
We are therefore reaching out to you, as an elected body representing
affiliates in the region, to understand your stance on this application and
to request your help in answering the following questions:
1. What role do you perceive the Wiki In Africa group to be playing in
the region?
2. Would a more narrow thematic scope for the Wiki In Africa group be
acceptable to regional affiliates? If so, what narrowing of scope would
you recommend?
We deeply appreciate your insight and assistance in this matter as we
continue our review of this application.
Regards
Kirill Lokshin
Chair, Affiliations Committee