Hoi,
I have made my point, again, clear on the meta page.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 7/31/07, Andrew Dunbar <hippytrail(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 30/07/07, GerardM <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hoi,
The discussion states that it is a policy statement and not a technical
discussion.
There are technical reasons why it is not feasible to have a consistent
implementation of a different methodology. It is imho a waste of time to
discuss what you want to change if it is technically not possible and
certainly when this is clear from the start.
Thanks,
GerardM
So please discuss those technical reasons. To not do so would be to
waste the discussion and everybody's time. Maybe it's impossibility is
also just your opinion. Or if this impossibility has been clear from the
start please point us to a clear description of the insurmountable
problems.
Thanks.
Andrew Dunbar (hippietrail)
On 7/30/07, Ariel T. Glenn
<ariel(a)columbia.edu> wrote:
>
> Please see
>
>
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Interwiki.py/Wiktionary_functionality_discus…
information. The dicussion page on Meta is intended to provide
> a space for folks from every wiktionary
project to discuss and decide
upon
> the behavior and features of the interwiki
links bot (RobotGMwikt);
until
> now, there has been no such mechanism.
Besides your participation, we
also
> need folks who are able to help translate
the dicussion on an ongoing
basis
as
appropriate.
Thanks.
Ariel Glenn
_______________________________________________
Wiktionary-l mailing list
Wiktionary-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l
_______________________________________________
Wiktionary-l mailing list
Wiktionary-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l
--
http://wiktionarydev.leuksman.com http://linguaphile.sf.net
_______________________________________________
Wiktionary-l mailing list
Wiktionary-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l