The site and domains should remain (either archive as it is or keep editable with retrievable  history) for historical reasons! Over many decades, it will be precious to get back and ponder.


Why not? I personally consider Wikipedia as the last greatest innovation of mankind that took place through another one, the vehicle of internet.

-Viswam




On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 00:48, Steven Walling <swalling@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hey everyone,

[I may forward this on to Foundation-l depending on replies. The list has been very quiet recently.]

I just wanted to poke those interested in the long term plan for ten.wikipedia.org about our options, since basically all we're getting activity-wise on the site is the very occasional edit including some vandalism that has required revision deletions. 

As discussed on the Village Pump,[1] it looks like filing a bug to close it (meaning only Stewards could edit, but the site would be preserved) is the most viable option. The question I have is: would people like to open a formal request to close the project on Meta or are they okay with me just going ahead and filing a bug? 

Your input is appreciated, 

--
Steven Walling
Community Organizer at Wikimedia Foundation
wikimediafoundation.org

1. http://ten.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:VP#Ideas_for_what_to_do_with_tenwiki_in_the_future

_______________________________________________
WikiX-l mailing list
WikiX-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikix-l