I'd like that too, and would love to see it applied.
 
The problem is that my experience of anon edits, gained on WT and WV (and only for the swedish version) since 2006, is that the anon edits in 9 cases out of 10 are useless and do not contribute to the content.
 
//Mattias

2013/1/15 James Heilman <jmh649@gmail.com>
Disable anon edits? What about just applying "pending changes" so that all edits by anons need to be reviewed before going live?

James Heilman


On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Peter B Fitzgerald <pbf5@georgetown.edu> wrote:
I believe a request on Bugzilla, with a link back to the relevant discussion, would be the proper way to do this.

-Peter

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Mattias Sweden <riggwelter2012@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi!
 
If we would like to disable anon edits on Wikivoyage in sv; what's the procedure? This was intended to be done when we were still Wikitravel, but got lost in the transitions.
 
 
Mattias

_______________________________________________
Wikivoyage-l mailing list
Wikivoyage-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikivoyage-l



_______________________________________________
Wikivoyage-l mailing list
Wikivoyage-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikivoyage-l




--
James Heilman
MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian

The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine

_______________________________________________
Wikivoyage-l mailing list
Wikivoyage-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikivoyage-l