In the mailing list, all see and those responsible can respond. But on talk pages, unless i go there, i won't know someone somewhere has a problem.

On Friday, January 18, 2013, Mattias Sweden wrote:

Just a thought: shouldn't this topic be dealt with on the talk page of the article in question...?

Riggwelter

2013/1/18 Cacahuate <yocacahuate@gmail.com>

> <nagaraj.hadpad@gmail.com> wrote:
>> kashmir is half shown

We don't need a political map for our India article, we need a travel map - it should include areas that one can currently access and are controlled by India. The Kashmir dispute can be noted in the article, but the map needs to be a travel map that serves the traveler, that's our primary goal

Cacahuate

On Jan 18, 2013, at 8:56 AM, Sandy Harris <sandyinchina@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:21 AM, nagaraj hadpad
> <nagaraj.hadpad@gmail.com> wrote:
>> kashmir is half shown
>
> There are multiple maps on commons. This one may be better:
> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:India_in_its_region_%28disputed_hatched%29.svg
>
> However, it shows disputed territories hatched. Those appear to be the areas
> which India currently controls but that China or Pakistan also claim. If so, the
> caption needs to make that clear.
>
> Isn't there also at least one region in the West of Tibet which India claims but
> China controls? should that be shown?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikivoyage-l mailing list
> Wikivoyage-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikivoyage-l

_______________________________________________
Wikivoyage-l mailing list
Wikivoyage-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikivoyage-l