oh, i see
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:License_update

it is all merging
and i won't have to worry about the difference :)

its that simple, right?
(i only quickly skimmed the beta.wv discussion)


Juan de Vojníkov wrote:
Hi James,
have you read this:http://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:IRC_meeting:New_licence_for_Wikiversity_Beta
 
with asociated pages such as log?
 
Juan

 
2008/3/25, James Neill <lists@wilderdom.com>:
I realise this isn't a new topic, so feel to point me to
further/background reading...

but what are the implications and legal subtleties of the difference
between the licenses used on WV (GNU Free) and WE (CC Attribution)?

I would like to prepare a proforma letter to send to owners of copyright
material which I use in my teaching (e.g., an image in a presentation),
requesting permission for them to release the IP into a free culture
license which would it to be uploaded into Wiki Commons or elsewhere as
appropriate. My hunch is that > 50% could give permission.

If there is such a letter you know of or can share, please let me know.

Obviously it would be important for such a letter to cover all
conceivable licensing contingencies.

Is the solution to dual-license materials? And could that be done,
practically?

_______________________________________________
Wikiversity-l mailing list
Wikiversity-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l


_______________________________________________ Wikiversity-l mailing list Wikiversity-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l

No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.0/1341 - Release Date: 24/03/2008 3:03 PM


--
Email:     james@wilderdom.com
Web:       http://wilderdom.com
Twitter:   http://twitter.com/jtneill
Wiki/blog: http://ucspace.canberra.edu.au/x/fIAeAg
Bookmarks: http://del.icio.us/jtneill