To my knowledge, the WMF was not officially asked to provide the box (or anything) for this.  Given that, I don&#39;t think it&#39;s fair to say that the proposal failed with WMF.  <div><br></div><div>pb<br clear="all"><div>

___________________</div><div><div>Philippe Beaudette</div><div>Director, Community Advocacy<br></div><div>Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.</div><div><br></div><div>415-839-6885, x 6643 </div><div><br></div><div><a href="mailto:philippe@wikimedia.org" target="_blank">philippe@wikimedia.org<br>

</a></div></div><br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Juan de Vojníkov <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:juandevojnikov@gmail.com" target="_blank">juandevojnikov@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

I can understand why Sandbox Server proposal failed with WMDE (to write a plan of activities for a future is in the community which creates whatever whenever impossible).<br><br>But I don&#39;t understand why the primary attempt to get it from WMF failed also. WMF has old servers which are given to other similar NGOes, WMF host other projects on their servers, so?<br>


<br><br>Regards,<br>Juandev<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikiversity-l mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Wikiversity-l@lists.wikimedia.org">Wikiversity-l@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l" target="_blank">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>