Well, if you are talking about P2PU I would that they have an idea, but they dont know, how to do it. They has less self identity than Wikiversity. So it was maybe their good selfpresentation skill what attracted some people.
I remeber Teemu, talking about this nearly 2 years ago, when Ive been to their webside in summer, there was nothing, small chaos and I would say thay have just started. So how you get them Teemu?
Juan
2011/1/22
<WJhonson@aol.com>
In a message dated 1/22/2011 8:25:29 AM Pacific Standard Time, teemu.leinonen@aalto.fi writes:
Collaborating with the P2PU and all the other open education projects
is extremely important. When the movement is growing (as I hope)
different approaches with a similar kind of objectives will benefit all.
P2PU is open only in that you can volunteer to help it.
It is not open in its governance which is tightly held to a few people and not available for any kind of change. Not open to election, modification, policy changes of any sort. Certainly you can *offer* suggestions, but there is no model to obtain a position at which suggestions can be effected.
I would suggest that P2PU is not the sort of system with which we'd want to co-operate until they open all levels of their system.
Will Johnson
_______________________________________________
Wikiversity-l mailing list
Wikiversity-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l