Hi,

 

100 $ this would be nice ;-). But 50 € is at moment 1.26 * 50 = 63 $ (http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=EURUSD=X)  

 

About the “renter”: The renter is the “root of roots” and has the responsibility for the report but I think this work could be broken between all roots (every root observes some project and make the report for them) so not only one has all the work.

 

The a) on your mail is something for a new project. You are free to add anything :-)

 

Best regards,

Jan

 

Von: wikiversity-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:wikiversity-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] Im Auftrag von Gerald A
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Mai 2010 15:27
An: Mailing list for Wikiversity
Betreff: Re: [Wikiversity-l] Sandbox Server

 

Hi Daniel,

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Daniel Kinzler <daniel@brightbyte.de> wrote:

> So, is the €50 limit a monthly bill for server rental, or an up-front
> total cost of something?

This is monthly, for server rental. If a 2 or max 3 month commitment is
required, WMDE would guarantee the cost for that amount of time.

 

Wow, 50eu is about $100 if my memory serves. Let me say thank you for

the offer.

 

Now, it's been a few months since this last was discussed. Are there any restrictions

on where/from who the server is rented? (Does it have to be in DE/EU, does it have

to be managed, does it have to be a single server?) I'm just looking at what might

be possible.

 

To Reiterate what Jan Luca said: All that is needed is a) some people saying
what they plan to do and b) people telling us regularly what they have actually
been doing, so we know how the server is being used. So far, no one appears to
be willing to do that.

 

a) Wiki Campus Radio, and experiments with Voice and Voice Products.

I was involved in a number of Wiki Campus Radio experiments, and facilitated the sessions and the raw capture of the voice. Other participants edited them, and they were available in various formats to listen to. As the hardware/software we were using was on loan, some possibilities for on-demand capture/listening weren't there.

 

As for b), would a "formal report" be required, or would a summary (maybe with more details) suffice? How often would be considered "regular"?

 

Now we have one project listed. I have others in mind, but I'd like to see this one launched before adding to the pile.

 

Thanks,

Gerald